Without putting traditional printing before hybrid processing or extolling the virtues of either method, let me just mention one aspect - time - there is no big difference if you use one or the other.
It cost me US$75 for everything except the sink (no joke! sink was not included which I need for doing 6圆 and 35mm work. Here is why: After having gone down the hybrid route and not getting that little final "punch" from the scanned negs, I recently set up a wet darkroom again. I don't know if I would go for one if it became available. While post-processing of scans from older models meant (means) time and, not to forget, know-how. Certainly, while the 9000 goes through its motion, I can do something else. End results are very hard to distinguish from each other. The rest meant about an hour's tweaking in the Shop. With the Polaroid (Microtek) it used to take less than 10. Just these days I re-scanned a neg with the 9000, a 30 min' job with all the bells & whistles. Before those I worked with a Polaroid 4000 which, on paper, was inferior to the Nikons and various others. Before my current Nikon 9000, I had a 4000, then a 5000. Not a bad thing at all.Īs to Dmax, Harry, I would like to throw my 2 cts. Most likely will come with the latest version of SilverFast. Everything of course depends now on what's inside, on the specs. The 2 buttons top right being the give-away. From the (albeit somewhat sleeker) looks of the box one might deduct a connection to the PrimeFilm 120. Nothing wrong with a new and (hopefully) better mousetrap.
0 kommentar(er)
